“The times, they are a-changin” – Robert Zimmerman, aka, Bob Dylan, Nobel laureate.
As award-winning (and ex-crooner) Ron Shandler pointed out in the introduction to the 2018 Baseball Forecaster, the baseball landscape is a-changin’. This was also the theme at the recent BaseballHQ First Pitch Forums, entitled “Adapt or Die.” (OK, it was “Adapt or Lose,” but the former sounds more dramatic).
So, how to adapt to the new reality in a 12-team “only” auction league?
Blah blah blah home run
If you’ve not noticed, there were a lot of balls leaving the yard last year. 6105 homers in 2017, as compared to 4186 HRs in 2014. Everyone’s working on their launch angle these days. Kris Davis and Nelson Cruz hitting HRs, no big whoop…but Joey Gallo with 41 HR? 38 for Justin Smoak? Heck, Yonder Alonso had 28.
What that means—there’s so much power, you don’t have to pay much for it in 2018 auctions. Even in deep leagues like LABR, there will be power on the waiver wire. But history shows us it won’t be at every position; typically, DH/1B/OF types dominate the landscape. Skilled MI and C are unlikely to make up much of the pool, so it’s best to focus auction resources there and deal with deficiencies in the OF and CO via free agency or trade.
Unlock all of our insights on your way to a fantasy title! See what our season-long coverage offers and then subscribe to BaseballHQ.com.
Speed to burn—or not
Bet nobody in your mixed league was crushed when Jarrod Dyson and Ben Revere signed in the National League. But there aren’t a lot of reliable speed sources to go around in AL-only leagues, so losing 25+ SB guys hurts. Having Dee Gordon helps, but he will cost a ton. Speed’s become a scarcity, and needs to be treated as such.
Positional Flexibility
With the general lack of C/MI help on deep league waiver wires, positional flexibility helps immensely. In formats like LABR, where players are eligible at their 2017 draft positions throughout the 2018 season, multi-position qualifiers make it easier to acquire help.
Rotation anchors a thing of the past?
On the pitching side, yes, strikeouts are numerous. But compared to days past, they’re being spread among more pitchers. With the recently-installed 10-day DL, starters can be rested‚—missing only one start—to keep their innings down. In 2010, 45 pitchers topped 200 IP; in 2017, only 15 did. Of those, only five had over 200 Ks. So prepare to spread Ks over more pitchers heading in 2018 drafts.
Difference from previous AL-LABR strategy
Due to the wealth of cheap power, I made it my goal to spend $193 on offense, using a Stars and Scrubs approach. I’d focus more on speed, and make sure to roster solid MI, CO, and C. Scrubs would be in the OF/UT to take advantage of the anticipated free agent pool.
As for pitching—my weak spot in 2017 was starting pitching, with ERA, WHIP, and Ks lacking. So the budget went up, spending close to $70 rather than the usual $40-50. Ideally, I would also avoid guys with health grades of D or F. The focus would be on obtaining two high-IP, high-K starters for $40 or less. That eliminates the expensive Kluber and Sale,focusing more on guys like Severino and Archer. It also meant skipping the top closers and trolling the waters with more risk-guys like Treinen for $10 or less. The balance would be spent on middle relievers with high IP and Ks at low cost.
Spending goals:
C ($20) – 13/7
CO ($45) – 25/15/5
MI ($60) – 30/20/10
OF/DH ($68) – 30/15/13/5/3/2
SP ($55) – 25/20/6/2/2
RP ($12) – 9/1/1/1
Free agents at the LABR auctions
Dealing with the (still)-large pool of major league free agents was a topic of concern at the March 3 auction. The LABR rule is that free agents can be taken in the auction, but if the player signs in the opposite league, he gets dropped from your roster. That explains the low acquisition cost of a player like Jake Arrieta, since bidding on him involved a certain amount of risk. While I was not willing to take the chance on Arrieta at the expected cost, I’d take a chance on lower-priced free agents.
The team
Here’s how the Baseball HQ AL team looks. $R represents the values in RotoLab (70% offense/30% pitching, with a slight shift to Stars and Scrubs for valuation). Mayberry grades/scores included as a reference.
Pos Name Team Sal $R Mayberry === =============== ==== === == ============ C Zunino, Mike SEA 13 12 5123 33 ADD C Castro, Jason MIN 4 5 3313 30 ACA 1B Smoak, Justin TOR 17 17 4035 60 ACD 3B Ramirez, Jose CLE 28 28 3455 85 ABF CO Gonzalez, Marwin HOU 16 18 3245 60 ABF 2B Walker, Neil FA 2 13 3035 55 DBB SS Andrus, Elvis TEX 22 24 2455 80 AAC MI Cozart, Zach LAA 13 19 3345 75 DCD OF Rosario, Eddie MIN 22 20 4345 80 ABB OF Mancini, Trey BAL 15 17 3335 70 ABF OF Reddick, Josh HOU 9 14 2335 65 CBC OF Jones, Jacoby DET 1 9 3405 60 ADB OF Smith, Mallex TAM 12 16 1525 65 CCA UT Moss, Brandon OAK 1 6 4213 30 BBB SP Severino, Luis NYY 26 24 4405 85 ABD SP Bauer, Trevor CLE 15 14 2305 60 AAA SP Montgomery, Jordan NYY 9 9 1203 21 ACA SP Lynn, Lance FA 3 11 1205 45 FBB SP Minor, Mike TEX 6 8 1303 24 FDF RP McHugh, Colin HOU 3 3 2201 7 FAA RP Herrera, Kelvin KC 10 12 3330 36 ACC RP Brach, Brad BAL 8 13 2430 33 ACA RP O’Day, Darren BAL 2 3 3510 12 FCB RES Andriese, Matt TAM 0 1 1203 21 DCA RES Dozier, Hunter KC 0 2 5203 30 AFF RES Pauino, David HOU 0 1 3401 11 CDC RES Gonzalez, Miguel CHW 0 4 0103 3 DBB RES Hendricks, Liam OAK 0 -1 3400 0 CCA RES Smith, Joe LAA 0 2 5400 0 DCB Mayberry score breakdown: Batting PX RSpd xBA PA MM ======= == ==== === == === Actual 43 37 40 64 848 Target 37 23 32 54 600 Pitching xERA K Sv IP MM ======== ==== == == == === Actual 19 28 7 22 323 Target 17 27 5 25 320 Results
How did it go? Mostly according to plan. I did spend a bit more on pitching than I expected, but I got solid MIs, decent Cs, plenty of speed and positional flexibility, and some good starting pitching. Once I had a few players in the $20s, it became obvious that spreading the money around on players priced in the teens would be more effective than overpaying for more high-priced guys, so I did move away from S&S a bit.
Offense: With a $178 hitting/$82 pitching split, I didn’t spend as much as I expected on offense. But with solid MI/CO anchors and positional flexibility, I’m set up well for the season. Plenty of speed to trade, enough power, and a good BA. RotoLab shows the team with 54 points out a possible 60 in the projections. While I kept an eye on the Portfolio-3 tiers, I didn’t eliminate players from consideration if they didn’t fit well. While I did get some low-reliability guys, they’re mostly A-health grades.
Starting Pitching: I wanted two of Severino, Archer, and Bauer for $40, and even though I went a buck over, I’m pleased with the pair I got. I did well with xERA and Ks; RotoLab projects this staff to garner 45 of 60 pitching points. But I put more into pitching than expected, weakening the offense a bit.
Relievers: In general, never draft two closers, but when Brad Brach stalled at $7, I decided to go another dollar and pile up some projected saves.
Reserve rounds: The cupboard was pretty bare by this time, but I was happy to roster Andriese as a reserve, because I can stream him (the only way to use non-DL reserve spots in LABR is to draft them in the reserve rounds).
Overview
I put together the team I envisioned—and this team is set up well to compete in 2018. Plenty of positional flexibility, speed to spare, a high-K pitching staff, and roster spots where I can more easily access power in the free agent pool. Now, to play the season and see how it all plays out!